Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41518 (RAJ)

MAHESH BABU SUMAN S/O KAILASH RAHI SUMAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/17740/2025 · 2025-11-18

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47277] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17740/2025 Mahesh Babu Suman S/o Kailash Rahi Suman, Aged About 54 Years, R/o 1429 (28), Govind Nagar, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Education Department, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner (Rajasthan) 3. The Joint Director, School Education, Ajmer Division, Ajmer. 4. The District Education Officer, Headquarter, Secondary Education, Bhilwara. ----Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may very graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and further be pleased to: i. by issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, the respondents may kindly be directed to give seniority, promotion and salary of summer vacation to the Petitioner as well as increment counting his service from the date of joining. II. by issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, the respondents may kindly be further directed to grant relief to the Petitioner as has been granted in the case of Yogesh Kumar Pareek Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. SBCWP No. [2025:RJ-JP:47277] (2 of 3) [CW-17740/2025] 3534/2009 decided on 20.01.2014. ili. by issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, the respondents may kindly be directed to give arrears and other all service benefits to the Petitioner from the date of initial appointment. iv. Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the Petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 08.07.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12576/2025 titled as “Aruna Shekhawat & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.” submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur while placing reliance upon order dated 20.01.2014 in case of Yogesh Kumar Pareek Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3534/2009. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Aruna Shekhawat (supra) and Yogesh Kumar Pareek (supra) passed by this Court, at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents [2025:RJ-JP:47277] (3 of 3) [CW-17740/2025] are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /103