134 IN THE HIGH SANJAY GARG JITENDRA JORWAL, DC, SANGRUR AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Mr. Sumit Jain, Advocate with Mr. Tarun Seth, Mr. K.K. Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos.6 and 7. HARKESH MANUJA Learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4 submits that a lease agreement dated 22.04.2025 has been executed between respondent Nos.2 to 4 and petitioner. In addition, based on an office communication dated 07.05.2025, learned State counsel informs that the grains of the petitioner have been stored to the full capacity and the same shall be adhered to for a period of three years. In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition and the same is thus, disposed of. Rule discharged. In case the respon petitioner shall be at liberty to seek revival of the present petition. 08.05.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: SANJAY GARG Versus JITENDRA JORWAL, DC, SANGRUR AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate for the Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Mr. Sumit Jain, Advocate with Mr. Tarun Seth, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 to 4. Mr. K.K. Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos.6 and 7. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4 submits that a lease agreement dated 22.04.2025 has been executed between respondent Nos.2 to 4 and petitioner. In addition, based on an office communication dated 07.05.2025, learned State counsel informs that grains of the petitioner have been stored to the full capacity and the same shall be adhered to for a period of three years. In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition and the same is thus, disposed of. Rule discharged. In case the respondents fail to abide by the aforesaid, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek revival of the present petition. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1381-2024 Date of Decision: May 08, 2025 ........Petitioner JITENDRA JORWAL, DC, SANGRUR AND OTHERS ....Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. respondent Nos. 2 to 4. Mr. K.K. Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos.6 and 7. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4 submits that a lease agreement dated 22.04.2025 has been executed between respondent Nos.2 to 4 and petitioner. In addition, based on an office communication dated 07.05.2025, learned State counsel informs that grains of the petitioner have been stored to the full capacity and the same shall be adhered to for a period of three years. In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition dents fail to abide by the aforesaid, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek revival of the present petition. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2024 May 08, 2025 Learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4 submits that a lease agreement dated 22.04.2025 has been executed between respondent Nos.2 to 4 and petitioner. In addition, based on an office communication dated 07.05.2025, learned State counsel informs that grains of the petitioner have been stored to the full capacity and the In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition dents fail to abide by the aforesaid, the TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.05.13 09:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document