APHC010677072025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 1346 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-36 [3552] Jami Appa Rao ...Appellant Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Appellant : Ms. P. Satya Harshita appearing vice Mr. Pala Karthi Kiran Advocates for Respondents : GP for Home CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 20th December 2025 P C : The present Writ Appeal, under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, has been preferred against the judgment and order, dated 19.11.2025, passed in W.P.No.32136 of 2025. 2. The appellant’s main grievance is that even when the appellant is in possession of a parcel of land which is agricultural in character admeasuring Ac.01.48 Cents falling in Sy.No.376/1 in Lakkavarapukota Village and Mandal of Vizianagaram District, the private respondent Nos.10 to 2 HCJ & CGRJ W.A.No.1346 of 2025 15, with the help of the police authorities and in particular respondent No.9, were preventing the appellant from cultivating the land in question and were thus acting highhandedly and without any legal authority. 3. We also see from the record that there has been quite a bit of litigation between the appellant and the private respondents. There was a suit for partition, which was filed by the respondents which has since been dismissed, an appeal is stated to have been filed but is also stated to have since abated. The appellant therefore claims to be in possession. 4. On a specific question as to whether there was any interim order passed by any civil court, either for or against the appellant, in respect of the property in question which was currently in force, learned counsel for the appellant would submit that there existed none. 5. It goes without saying that unless and until there is an order passed by a civil court, which requires to be enforced through the agency of the police, the police authorities would normally not interfere with the right of possession of any of the parties, who claims to be so in possession. 6. Be that as it may, since apparently the dispute is in regard to a property, therefore, we feel it appropriate that the appellant approach the appropriate civil court for redressal of grievances, in case any of the respondents trying to interfere with the possession of the appellant over the property, which the appellant claims was in his possession. 3 HCJ & CGRJ W.A.No.1346 of 2025 7. This Writ Appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J kbs 4 HCJ & CGRJ W.A.No.1346 of 2025 46 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN W.A.No.1346 of 2025 Dt: 20.12.2025 kbs