IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 209 Krishan and others Shri Vinay Kumar Selection Commission, Panchkula CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) contempt proceedings complying the order dated ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP and others vs. State of Haryana and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of on the basis of statement made by learned counsel for the State to the effect that 01.2.2024, shall be decided by respondent No four weeks.” COCP-1329-2024 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1329 of 2024 Date of decision : Krishan and others Versus Shri Vinay Kumar (IRPS Officer), Secretary of Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Vikrant Koundal, Advocate for Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate for petitioners No.2 to 8. Petition qua petitioner No.1 was withdrawn (vide order dated 14.8.2024). Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners No.2 to 8 submits that contempt proceedings be initiated against the respondent for not ing the order dated 21.2.2024 (Annexure P ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP-3938 and others vs. State of Haryana and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of on the basis of statement made by learned counsel for the State to the effect that “…the pending representation, dated 01.2.2024, shall be decided by respondent No four weeks.” 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1329 of 2024 (O & M) Date of decision :-23.09.2025 …..Petitioners (IRPS Officer), Secretary of Haryana Staff …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Vikrant Koundal, Advocate for Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate petitioner No.1 was withdrawn (vide order Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Learned counsel for the petitioners No.2 to 8 submits that against the respondent for not (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- 3938-2024 titled as “Krishan and others vs. State of Haryana and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of on the basis of statement made by learned counsel for “…the pending representation, dated 01.2.2024, shall be decided by respondent No.4, within a period of VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.25 09.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document necessary compliance has been made, while passing a Speaking Order dated 23.7.2024 by the respondent in the present petition. produced by the learned counsel for the respondent record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for petitioners No.2 to 8. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place the paper- since the with and a Speaking Order dated 23.7.2024 has been respondent of. However, the petitioners may be granted liberty to challenge the said Speaking Order dated 23.7.2024 as per law, if so advised. made by learned counsel for the petitioners No.2 to 8, the present contempt petition is petitioners. September Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-1329-2024 (O & M) Learned counsel for the respondent necessary compliance has been made, while passing a Speaking Order dated 23.7.2024 by the respondent-authority; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. Copy of the aforesaid Speaking Order dated produced by the learned counsel for the respondent record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for petitioners No.2 to 8. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place -book. Learned counsel for the petitioners No.2 to 8 submits that since the order dated 21.2.2024 (Annexure P with and a Speaking Order dated 23.7.2024 has been respondent-authority, the present contempt petition may be disposed of. However, the petitioners may be granted liberty to challenge the said Speaking Order dated 23.7.2024 as per law, if so advised. Heard. In view of the facts noted above made by learned counsel for the petitioners No.2 to 8, the present contempt petition is disposed of with the liberty aforesaid to the petitioners. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. eptember 23, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that necessary compliance has been made, while passing a Speaking Order authority; thus, no cause survives opy of the aforesaid Speaking Order dated 23.7.2024 produced by the learned counsel for the respondent-State is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for petitioners No.2 to 8. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in Learned counsel for the petitioners No.2 to 8 submits that order dated 21.2.2024 (Annexure P-1) has been complied with and a Speaking Order dated 23.7.2024 has been passed by the authority, the present contempt petition may be disposed of. However, the petitioners may be granted liberty to challenge the said Speaking Order dated 23.7.2024 as per law, if so advised. In view of the facts noted above and the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners No.2 to 8, the present with the liberty aforesaid to the Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.25 09.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document