- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40905 CRP No. 501 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.501 OF 2018 BETWEEN: 1. SRI CHANDRAVATHI W/O BALAKRISHNA POOJARY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT ANADKA, MARAKKOOR SHANTHIGODU VILLAGE, PUTTUR TALUK, D.K-574201 2. SMT. NALINI W/O SESSAPPA NAIK, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS MUNDODI HOUSE, ANADKA SHANTHIGODU VILLAGE, PUTTUR TALUK, D.K-574 201 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI ARUNA SHYAM M, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI M PARAMESHWARA BHANDARY S/O THIMMAPPA BHANDARY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT MANIA HOUSE, NARIMOGARU VILLAGE, PUTTUR TALUK, D.K-574201 …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT-SERVED) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 02.08.2018 PASSED ON IA NO.II IN E.P.NO.2/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, PUTTUR, Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40905 CRP No. 501 of 2018 D.K. REJECTING IA NO.II FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed memo which reads as under: “The petitioner humbly submits that the above case has been filed challenging the order passed by the learned Magistrate on the 02.08.2018 under Order VII Rule 11 in E.P.No.2/2016. However, since the petitioner in E.P.No.2/2016 i.e., the respondent in the present case has not pressed the election petition. As such, the same has come to be dismissed as not pressed on 02.01.2023. Hence, this petition does not survive for consideration. The memo may kindly be placed on record in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. In view of memo, revision petition is dismissed as it would not survive for further consideration. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR