Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41503 (RAJ)

PITAMER @ PINTOO S/O NANAGRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12887/2025 · 2025-10-17

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42617] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12887/2025 Pitamer @ Pintoo S/o Nanagram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Anandnagr Khairthal, Police Station- Khairthal, District- Khairthal- Tijara (Raj.) (Accused Confined In Central Jail At Ti- jara) ----Accused/Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 17/10/2025 The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity “the BNSS”). The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.0299/2025 registered at Police Station Khairthal, District Khairthal-Tijara for the offence(s) under Sections 318(2), 318(3), 318(4), 316(2) 319(2), 336(3), 338, 339, 112(2) 61(2)(b) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity, ‘BNS’), Sections 66C and 66D of IT Act, 2008 and Sections 42(3)(e) and 42(6) of Telecom Act, 2003. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 15.09.2025, investigation as against him is [2025:RJ-JP:42617] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12887/2025] complete, the offences are triable by Magistrate, he has no criminal antecedents and prays for his release on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer. Taking into consideration the contentions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, material available in the case diary, nature of accusation against him, his length of custody, the offences being triable by Magistrate and absence of criminal antecedents; but, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Pitamer @ Pintoo S/o Nanagram shall be released on bail under Section 483 BNSS in connection with afore-mentioned FIR registered at concerned Police Station, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of ₹1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of ₹50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he shall comply with all the conditions laid down under Section 480(3) BNSS. The office is directed to remit a copy of this order to the jurisdictional Court through E-mail forthwith. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J PRAGATI/165