IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31182 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-514 Year-2024 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== Sri Ram Yadav @ Biteshar Yadav son of Late Sarju Yadav @ Saryu Yadav Village- ismailbalbapar, Ps- Tekari, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 20-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 74, 127(1), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 351(2) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. 3. The case of the prosecution is that while the informant was irrigating her field, the petitioner who is agnate of the informant went there and stopped her from irrigating the land. It is further alleged that he assaulted with garasa to the informant due to which the informant has cut injury on her leg. When the son of the informant came to rescue, he was assaulted with garasa on his back. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31182 of 2025(2) dt.20-05-2025 2/2 falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is agnate of the informant and there is land dispute between the parties. From perusal of the FIR itself, it is clear that the petitioner has given only one garasa blow to the informant and her son. There is no repetition of the blow. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 11.12.2024. 5. Learned APP appearing for the state has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 514 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned I/C A.C.J.M.-VI, Gaya. Shubham/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T