2025:JHHC:27040 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI (Civil Writ Jurisdiction) W.P. (C) No.1558 of 2017 ---- Radhika Devi, wife of Rajendra Tiwari, Resident of Village – Halwanta Kala, P.O.-Mahdeiya, P.S.-Nagar Untari, District – Garhwa. …. …. Petitioner(s) Versus 1. Jugal Kishore Choudhary, Son of Late Kanhai Choudhary 2. Surya Kishore Choudhary, Son of Late Kanhai Choudhary Both residents of Chitbashram, P.O.+P.S.- Nagar Untrai, District – Garhwa. 3. (I) Ramjanam Chaudhari, 3. (II) Atinder Chaudhari, 3. (III) Yogendra Chaudhari All are sons of Late Deo Kumar Chaudhary, Resident of Village – Halwanta Kala, P.O.-Mahdeiya, P.S.-Nagar Untari, District – Garhwa. 3. (IV) Manju Devi, W/o Prabhu Chaudhari & D/o Late Deo Kumar Chaudhari, R/o Village & P.O.+P.S.- Bishrampur, District – Palamau. 4. Punia Devi, Wife of late Hullas Choudhary 5. Raghurai Choudhary, son of late Hullas Choudhary 6. Pramod Choudhary, son of Late Hullas Choudhary, Respondents No.4to 6 are residents of Village – Banka, P.O.+P.S.- Meral, District – Garhwa. 7. Reena Devi, wife of Ram Chandra Choudhary @ Ram Choudhary, Resident of Village – Chauriya, P.O.+P.S.- Bhawnathpur, District – Garhwa. …. …. Respondent(s) ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Pandey, Adv. ---- 14/Dated: 08th September, 2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed for following reliefs:- “for quashing the order dated 08.02.2017 passed in Title Appeal No.01/2012 by learned Additional Sessions Judge- VI, Garhwa, whereby and where-under the Additional Sessions Judge- VI, Garhwa rejected the application of appellant filed under section Order-41, Rule-27 of the C.P.C. for allowing the original / certified documents as additional evidence in appellate stage which are already filed in trial court but not exhibited.” 2025:JHHC:27040 Page | 2 W.P. (C) No.1558 of 2017 2. The subject matter of the dispute is the order dated 08.02.2017 passed in T.A. No.01 of 2012. 3. It has been informed by the other side that the Title Appeal itself has been disposed of on 21.11.2022. 4. In that view of the matter, the present writ petition has become infructuous, accordingly, the same is hereby disposed of as infructuous. 5. However, the parties are at liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Amar/- Uploaded