Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 415 (UTT)

MR REHMAN ZIA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/527/2025 · 2026-05-08

Alok Mahra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS C-528 No. 527 of 2025 Hon ’ble Alok Mah r a, J. Mr. Arushi Batra, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Pratiroop Pande, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Ms. Prabha Naithani, learned counsel for the complainant. 4. The present criminal misc. application is filed with a prayer to quash and set-aside the order chargesheet, cognizance/ summoning order as well as the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 2929 of 2020, under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC, pending in the court of learned ACJM, Dehradun. 5. In this case, applicant had taken a car loan of Rs. 9.45 Lakhs from respondent no. 3/ Bank. Since, the applicant did not pay the instalments, therefore, on inquiry, respondent no. 3 found that in fact, applicant had not purchased any car and filed a forged R.C. of the vehicle. Thereafter. An FIR was lodged and chargesheet was filed in the matter. During the trial, settlement was reached between the applicant and respondent no. 3 in which the applicant have repaid the total loan amount alongwith the interest to the tune of Rs. 14 Lakhs to the Bank. 6. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that in the case of another co-accused being C-482 NO. 146 of 2022, the Coordinate Bench of this Court have already compounded the same offence on similar set of facts. It is further submitted that now the applicant have paid the entire loan amount. 7. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 would submit that the Bank have issued the NOC. The Bank Manager, Ms. Swati is also virtually present before the Court. She submits that now they have no grievances with the applicant as entire loan amount has been paid by the applicant. 8. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 9. In such view of the matter, the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 2929 of 2020, under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC, pending in the court of learned ACJM, Dehradun, are hereby quashed qua the applicant. FIR and charge-sheet filed pursuant thereto stand quashed. 10. Accordingly, the present criminal misc. application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. ( Alok Mah r a J.) 08.05.2026 Ujjwal