1 2025:CGHC:44544 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 4653 of 2025 1 - Surendra Khande S/o Shri Dhaniram Satanami Aged About 53 Years R/o Pendari, Sakri, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur, C.G. 2 - Radhakrishna Gopal S/o Jethu Ram Gopal Aged About 49 Years R/o Ward No. 17, Old Chandaniya Para, Janjgir, District- Janjgir- Champa, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of Public Works Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, C.G. 2 - Secretary General Administration Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, C.G. 3 - Secretary Department Of Health, Indravati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, C.G. 4 - Engineer-In-Chief Public Works Department, Indravati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, C.G. 5 - Executive Engineer Public Works Department, Division No. 1 Near Collctorate, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, C.G. 6 - Umang Gauraha S/o Umesh Gauraha R/o G- 14 Songanga Colony, Seepat Road Sarkanda, Bilaspur, C.G. ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Ali Asgar & Mr. Manoj Rai, Advocates For State-Respondent : Mr. Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate VASANT KUMAR Digitally signed by VASANT KUMAR Date: 2025.09.03 11:03:46 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 02/09/2025 1. By way of this petition, petitioner sought the following relief(s) : “(A) To call for the record for the perusal of this Hon’ble Court. (B) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly issue a writ of Mandamus and issue diretions to the respondent authorities for conducting proper medical examination of Respondent No.6 as per the orders passed by department. (C) That any other relief which this Court thinks fit in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that the respondent no.6 was appointed on 21.01.2022 to the post of Sub- Engineer under the Special Recruitment Drive for physically disabled persons at Public Works Department, and secured his appointment based on his physical disability (deafness). The instant petition is being filed against the inaction on the part of respondents Authorities in not complying the order passed by Hon'ble High Court and orders of General Administration Department (GAD) for verification and fresh medical examination of employees/officers who have obtained job on the basis of medical certificate after 01-01-2019. Hence, this petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State opposes the submission made by counsel for the petitioner and contended that petitioners have no locus to challenge the appointment of respondent No.6. He further contended that in terms of direction issued by the GAD, respondent No.6 again 3 examined by the Medical Board and respondent No.6 submitted his medical disability certificate before the competent authority and competent authority, i.e., Chief Engineer- PWD, Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar, wrote a memo No.39082071 dated 29.02.2024 that the petitioner has been directed to appear before the Medical Board by way of letter dated 21.07.2023 and thereafter the petitioner appeared before the Medical Board and again he has filed new disability certificate on 01.12.2023. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents with utmost circumspection. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submission made by learned counsel for the parties. Further considering Memo No.39082071 dated 29.02.2024 issued by the Office of Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.), which is as under : “ कृ पया संदर्भि त पत्रों कृ अवलोकृन कृरन कृ कृष्ट कृर, जिसंकृ माध्यामा सं श्री संरन्द्र खाण्डेया, कृनन पडेर, संकृर, जिलो बि%लोसंपर (छत्तीसंगढ़) कृ पत्रों दिदनकृ बिनरकृ एव श्री दवन्द्र सिंसंह ठाकृ र, अधि0वक्त पत 27 लो, बिवकृसं नगर बि%लोसंपर (छत्तीसंगढ़) कृ पत्रों दिदनकृ 26.10.2023 कृ2 छयाप्रबित प्रबि4त कृरत हुए प्रकृरण कृ परक्षण कृर, प्रबितवदन प्रस्तत कृरन कृ बिनद9श दिदया गया ह;। शिशकृयातकृत> कृ द्वार श्री उमाग गAरह उपअभि यात कृ श्रीवण %धि0त दिदव्यांग प्रमाण पत्रों कृ2 संत्यातत कृ2 च कृरन हत बिनवदन बिकृया ह;। छत्तीसंगढ़ शसंन, लोकृ बिनमा>ण बिव ग मात्रोंलोया माहनदF वन नव रयापर अटलो नगर कृ पत्रों क्रमाकृ 2487/1109/2023/19/ संमान्वया दिदनकृ 28.06.2023 कृ संथ 4 संलोग्न छत्तीसंगढ़ शसंन, संमान्या प्रशसंन बिव ग मात्रोंलोया माहनदF वन नव रयापर अटलो नगर कृ परिरपत्रों क्रमाकृ एफ 13-4/2023/आ.प्र./1-3 दिदनकृ 29.05.2023 कृ2 कृ2 कृ बिडेकृ 2 मा दिदया गया बिनद9शनसंर दिदनकृ 1 नवर 2019 कृ पश्चातO बिनयाक्त हुए संमास्त शसंकृ2या संवकृ दिदव्यांग प्रमाण- पत्रों कृ आ0र पर शसंकृ2या संव मा कृया>रत हP, कृ शररिरकृ परक्षण उपरत दिदव्यांग प्रमाण- पत्रों कृ2 बिनयामानसंर माबिडेकृलो %डेQ सं पनR Sच कृरया न ह;। कृया>लोयान पत्रों क्रमाकृ 39081022/स्था./प्र.अ./23 दिदनकृ 21.07.2023 कृ माध्यामा सं कृया>पलोन अभि यात लो.बिन.बिव. सं ग क्र. 1, बि%लोसंपर कृ माध्यामा सं श्री उमाग गAरह उपअभि यात कृ सं%धि0त जिलो माबिडेकृलो %डे> कृ संमाक्ष शररिरकृ परक्षण हत उपस्थिस्थात हन कृ शिलोए बिनद9शिशत कृरन तथ उक्त दिदव्यांग कृमा>चर सं जिलो माबिडेकृलो %डे> द्वार र नवन दिदव्यांगत प्रमाण पत्रों प्रप्त कृर प्रस्तत कृरन हत बिनद9शिशत बिकृया गया, जिसंकृ अनक्रमा मा कृया>पलोन अभि यात, लो.बिन.बिव. सं ग क्र. 1 बि%लोसंपर कृ पत्रों क्रमाकृ 7701/स्था./2022-23 दिदनकृ 01.12.2023 द्वार श्री उमाग गAरह उपअभि यात सं नवन दिदव्यांग प्रमाण पत्रों प्रप्त कृर इसं कृया>लोया कृ प्रबि4त बिकृया गया ह;। उक्त पत्रों कृ संथ संलोग्न माख्या शिचबिकृत्सं एव स्वस्थ्या अधि0कृर बि%लोसंपर कृ पत्रों क्रमाकृ/माZ.शिच.अ./2023/12493 दिदनकृ 21.11.2023 मा उल्लोखा ह; बिकृ प्रमाण पत्रों क्रमाकृ 42 दिदनकृ 10.11.2020 रजिस्टर मा इन्द्र ह;, जिसंमा दिदव्यांगत प्रबितशत 46 एव व;0त 05 व4> हत दिदनकृ 10.11.2025 तकृ ह;। उन्हन याह उल्लोखा बिकृया ह; बिकृ उपरक्त दिदव्यांग प्रमाण पत्रों कृ पनR परक्षण नकृ, कृन, गलो रग बिवश4ज्ञ संदस्या जिलो माबिडेकृलो %डे> बि%लोसंपर सं कृरया गया, जिसंमा श्री उमाग गAरह कृ र दिदव्यांगत प्रमाण पत्रों संत्याबिपत हन पया गया।" 6. In view of the above, it is crystal clear that as per the report of the Chief Engineer, the petitioner has physically examined by the Medical Board and the Board issued a fresh disability certificate. It is pertinent 5 to mention that the petitioners have no locus standi to challenge the appointment of respondent No.6. However, the petitioners have filed the petition for the reasons based known to them. 7. Accordingly, the petition being devoid of any merit is liable to be and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Vasant