Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41491 (JHR)

ABDUL MAZID v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6209/2025 · 2025-10-30

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:32643 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 6209 of 2025 1. Abdul Mazid Aged about 65 years, son of Rahman Miyan, resident of village-Salgaon, P.O. and P.S. Katkamdag, District-Hazaribag 2. Abdul Karim aged about 67 years, son of late Abdul Habib, resident of village and P.O. Pelawal, P.S. Katkamsandi, District-Hazaribag 3. Manir Ansari, aged about 70 years, son of late Md. Nasir, resident of village Romi, P.O. Pelawal, P.S. Katkamsandi, District-Hazaribag 4. Amzad Ali @ Amjad Ali, Aged about 37 years, son of Hussaini Miyan, resident of village Romi, P.O. Pelawal, P.S. Katkamsandi, District- Hazaribag 5. Pratima Devi @ Pratima aged about 46 years, wife of Kuldeep Prasad, resident of village Meyatu, P.O. Sultana, P.S. Katkamdag, District- Hazaribag. ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Shailendra Jit, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, A.P.P. 04/ 30.10.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Katkamdag P.S. Case No. 135 of 2022, registered under sections 323, 420, 423, 467, 468, 504, 506, 120B of the I.P.C., pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Hazaribag. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that allegations are made that petitioner nos. 3 and 4 have sold the land in question to petitioner nos. 1 and 2 on the forged genealogical table. He further submits that informant and others have instituted Original Title Suit No. 129 of 2024 for the land in question. He also submits that case is civil in nature inspite of that criminal motion has been given effect to. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations are there of selling the land on the forged genealogical table. ( 2025:JHHC:32643 ) 5. Considering that allegations are made that petitioner nos. 3 and 4 have sold the land in question to petitioner nos. 1 and 2 and further informant and others have instituted Original Title Suit No. 129 of 2024 for the land in question. Prima facie it appears that case is civil in nature. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Hazaribag, in connection with Katkamdag P.S. Case No. 135 of 2022, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.30.10.2025 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-