[2025:RJ-JP:51327] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15197/2025 Aas Mohammed S/o Shri Deen Mohammed, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Village Notanki, Police Station Nageena, District Nooh Mewat (Haryana). (Presently Confined In District Jail, Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15600/2025 Najim S/o Shri Ibrahim, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Basburja, Police Station Sikari, District Deeg (Raj.). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Sewar, Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta with Mr. Rahul Sharma Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 18/12/2025 The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.215/2024 registered at Police Station Gahnoli Mode, District Bharatpur for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 5, 8 of the Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of [2025:RJ-JP:51327] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15197/2025] Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) Act, 1995 and Section 132 & 109(2) of B.N.S. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case, they have nothing to do with the alleged offence(s) and they are behind the bars since 11.01.2025 & 01.11.2025 respectively. Counsel further submits that the FIR was lodged on 27.10.2024 and the petitioners were arrested on 11.01.2025 & 01.11.2025 respectively. Counsel further submits that the petitioners have not been named in the F.I.R. and the age of petitioner, namely Aas Mohammed, is 62 years. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, their further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and they are ready and willing to furnish their bail bonds. Therefore, the bail applications deserve to be allowed. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record. Taking into consideration the submissions put forth, custody period & the evidence adduced during investigation and overall facts & circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. Therefore, the bail applications are allowed. Accused- petitioners, namely Aas Mohammed S/o Shri Deen Mohammed & Najim S/o Shri Ibrahim, shall be released on bail, if they are not [2025:RJ-JP:51327] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15197/2025] required in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when they are called upon to do so. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /120-121