Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41484 (ALL)

OM DEV MAURYA AND ANOTHER v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/10934/2025 · 2025-09-23

Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 10934 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Order on Order Sheet. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to implead 'Under Secretary (Ministry of Labour and Employment), Government of India, New Delhi' as respondent no.6 in the array of parties during the course of the day. Order on Writ Petition. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Krishna Ji Shukla, Advocate bearing Advocate Roll No.A/K0269/2012 holding brief of Sri Ishan Shishu, learned counsel for respondent no.1 and Sri V.K. Dixit, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for respondent nos.2 to 5. 2. The petitioners are running an N.G.O. which is engaged in imparting Special Training to child labour education under the scheme floated by the Union of India namely 'National Child Labour Project' (राष्ट्रीय बालश्रम पिरयोजना), but their wages for imparting education has not been paid under the said scheme. 3. It is submitted that the District Magistrate/Chairman of Child Labour Abolition Samiti, Kaushambi has written a letter to the Under Secretary, Labour Department for release of fund so that the payment can be released to the petitioners. 4. The grievance of the petitioners is that respondent-authority is seized with the matter and is not releasing the fund despite the fact that respondents admit the fact that petitioners are imparting education under the aforesaid Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Somendra Singh, Uday Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Ishan Shishu Om Dev Maurya And Another .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) scheme to the child labours. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents states that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to newly impleaded respondent no.6 to consider the grievance of the petitioners. 6. Considering the aforesaid fact, we dispose off the writ petition permitting the petitioners to file a detailed representation raising all their grievance before the newly impleaded respondent no.6-Under Secretary (Ministry of Labour and Employment), Government of India, New Delhi within a period of one month from today. On submitting such representation, the newly impleaded respondent no.6 shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date he receives the representation of the petitioners. September 24, 2025 Sattyarth WRIC No. 10934 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad