VIVEK KUMAR YADAV v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND 13 OTHERS
WRIB/1890/2020 · 2025-07-07
Ajay Bhanot
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41480 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41480 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:107014 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1890 of 2020 Petitioner :- Vivek Kumar Yadav Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation And 13 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kailash Nath Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rajesh Pratap Singh Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. This writ petition is directed against the order declining to transfer the matter from a particular court to another court. The Deputy Director of Consolidation against whom transfer application was made was transferred and subsequently has superannuated from service. The cause of action on which the writ petition was founded does not survive. The writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Interim order is vacated. However, in view of the fact that the matter remain pending for six years, the officiating Deputy Director of Consolidation is directed to conclude the hearing within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Both parties are directed to cooperate in the proceedings before the court below. Order Date :- 8.7.2025 Dhananjai Digitally signed by :- DHANANJAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad