2025:JHHC:26595 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI (Civil Writ Jurisdiction) W.P. (C) No.392 of 2022 ---- Peter Tigga, s/o Late John Tigga, aged about 46 years, r/o Village Nutan Nagar, PO Korrah, PS Muffassil & District Hazaribagh. …. …. Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh, PO, PS & District Hazaribagh. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Hazaribagh, PO, PS & District Hazaribagh. 4. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Hazaribagh, PO, PS & District Hazaribagh. 5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Hazaribagh, PO, PS & District Hazaribagh. 6. The Circle Officer, Barkagaon Anchal, Hazaribagh, PO & PS Barkagaon & District Hazaribagh. 7. The District Mining Officer, Hazaribagh, PO, PS & District Hazaribagh. 8. The District Pollution Control Officer, Hazaribagh, PO, PS & District Hazaribagh. 9. The Officer in Charge, Barkagaon Police Station, PO & PS Barkagaon, District Hazaribagh. 10. Mangal Turi, s/o Late Puran Turi. 11. Rajesh Mirdha, s/o Bengali Mirdha. Both 9 & 10 r/o village Koilang, Tola Lambki Tand, PO Gosai Balia, PS Barkagaon, District Hazaribagh. …. …. Respondent(s) ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogesh Modi, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar, G.A.-III Mr. Rakesh Kr. Roy, A.C. to G.A.-III ---- 11/Dated: 02nd September, 2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed for following reliefs:- “for issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/order(s)/direction(s) in the nature of mandamus commanding upon the official respondents to act on the representations (which are more than one) made against respondent no. 10 & 11 for unauthorized construction of brick kiln over the raiyati land of the petitioner situated at village Koilang under Khata No. 12, Plot Nos. 323, 324, 331, 335 measuring an area of 3.96 acres and for any other relief(s) 2025:JHHC:26595 Page | 2 W.P. (C) No.392 of 2022 as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law. 3. Learned counsel for the State is no objection. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is hereby disposed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Amar/- Uploaded