The Krishna District Milk Producers v. The Assistant Director
WP/25078/2010 · 2025-12-09
Sumathi Jagadam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41477 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41477 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010442212010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 25078/2010 Between:
1. THE KRISHNA DISTRICT MILK PRODUCERS, MUTUALLY AIDED CO-OPERATIVE UNION LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGIGN DIRECTOR T.BABU RAO, S/O. T.V. CHALAPATHI RAO
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, EMPLOYMENT STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION LTD., 2ND FLOOR, PADMANABHA BUILDINS, NO.
14-20-27, GANDI NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA,
2. THE RECOVERY OFFICER, EMPLOYMENT STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION LTD., 2ND FLOOR, PADMANABHA BUILDIGNS, NO.
14-20-27, GANDI NAGAR VIJAYAWADA,
3. M KISHORE KUMAR, LABOUR CONTRACTOR, MPF VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT (R3 IS NOT NECESSARY )
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order No. AP/SRO/VJA; MEC/62-00-016321-000-0008 dt. 10-08-2010 passed by the Ist respondent under sec. 45 A of ESi Act and the consequential demand notice No. 62- Q/RRO/62-16321-08/5847/2010 dt. 14-9-2010 issued by the 2nd Respondent
2 JS,J W.P.No.25078/2010
for the recovery of R. 8,88,587/- as illegal and arbitrary and set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP 32059 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the demand notice No. 62-Q/RRO/62-16321-08/5847/2010 dt. 14-9- 2010 issued by the 2nd Respondent for the recovery of Rs. 9,88,587/- pending final disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. A V S LAXMI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. U.R.P. SRINIVAS
2. PUSHPINDER KAUR
3 JS,J W.P.No.25078/2010
The Court made the following ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to make a fresh representation to the respondent authorities under the new Amnesty Scheme which was introduced by the Employees’ State Insurance Corporation on 24.07.2025.
3. Therefore, without going into merits of the case, the petitioner is
directed to make representation to the respondent authorities within two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. Thereafter, the respondents shall consider and pass appropriate orders within eight (8) weeks.
4. With the above observation, the Writ Petition stands closed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 10.12.2025
KAS
4 JS,J W.P.No.25078/2010
237 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 25078/2010
Dated: 10.12.2025 KAS