IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 119 Mohinder Singh (now deceased) through LRs Rupinder Kaur and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) defendant through legal judgments and decrees of the learned Courts below whereby the suit of the respondents/plaintiffs for grant of maintenance, possession and permanent injunction has been decreed. is yet to be issued. Further, vide order dated 05.8.2024 learned counsel for the appellants sought time to bring on record the “examination of PW opportunity was granted to him to comply with however, the needful has not been done till date. The matter has been repeatedly adjourned either on request of learned counsel for the appellants or due to non today there is no representation RSA-1155-2023 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No.1155 of 2023 Date of decision :-13.08.2025 Mohinder Singh (now deceased) through LRs Versus Rupinder Kaur and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the appellants. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) The present regular second appeal has been filed by the defendant through legal representatives against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned Courts below whereby the suit of the respondents/plaintiffs for grant of maintenance, possession and permanent injunction has been decreed. Although the appeal is of the year 202 is yet to be issued. Further, vide order dated 05.8.2024 learned counsel for the appellants sought time to bring on record the examination of PW-1 Rupinder Kaur (Plaintiff No.1) opportunity was granted to him to comply with however, the needful has not been done till date. The matter has been repeatedly adjourned either on request of learned counsel for the appellants or due to non-appearance on behalf of the appellants. today there is no representation on behalf of appellants. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No.1155 of 2023 (O & M) .2025 Mohinder Singh (now deceased) through LRs …..Appellants …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA The present regular second appeal has been filed by the representatives against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned Courts below whereby the suit of the respondents/plaintiffs for grant of maintenance, possession and Although the appeal is of the year 2023, notice of motion is yet to be issued. Further, vide order dated 05.8.2024 learned counsel for the appellants sought time to bring on record the 1 Rupinder Kaur (Plaintiff No.1)”. Although, opportunity was granted to him to comply with the said order, however, the needful has not been done till date. The matter has been repeatedly adjourned either on request of learned counsel for the appearance on behalf of the appellants. Even on behalf of appellants. VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.19 19.08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document appellants the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended appellants have adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that neither the appellant pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other option except to August 13 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No RSA-1155-2023 (O & M) A bare reading of the above facts shows that the s have exhibited an utterly casual attitude in the pursuit of the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the s in the interest of justice. On the other hand, the appellant adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that neither the appellants nor their counsel are seriously interested in ng the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the same for non Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. 3, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 A bare reading of the above facts shows that the exhibited an utterly casual attitude in the pursuit of the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public in affording opportunities to the in the interest of justice. On the other hand, the appellants adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that counsel are seriously interested in ng the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other the same for non-prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.19 19.08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document