Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41461 (AP)

Ankuri Rasool Bee, v. NIL

CRP/2477/2025 · 2025-11-13

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010503992025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2477/2025 Between: 1. ANKURI RASOOL BEE,, W/O ANKURI DASTAGIRI, AGED 38 YEARS, R/O D/O 20/219 MODAMEEDI VILLAGE, PRODDATUR TOWN MANDAL, YSR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER A N D 1. NIL, ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to direct the II Additional District Judge, Kadapa, at Proddatur to number the lA Sr No. 3311, dated 20-8- 2025, and lA SR No. 3367, dated 22-8-2025 nd allow the lA as per the orders in Peethani Suryanarayana and anr Vs. Repaka Venkata Ramana Krishore and ors. Passed by the apex court and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the Certified Copy of the Returned Endorsement dated 22-08-2025 in I.A. SR No. 3311/2025 in I.A. SR No. 3367/2025 in G.O.P No. 2 of 2025, on the file of the Hon'ble II Additional District Judge, Kadapa, at : Proddatur in the above C.R.P. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. HARI BABU MAGULURI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: 2 O R D E R The Revision Petitioner/petitioner filed the present Revision Petition, challenging the Return Endorsement, dated 22.08.2025 in I.A.SR No.3311 of 2025 in I.A.SR No.3367 of 2025 in G.O.P.No.2 of 2025 made by the Office of the learned II Additional District Judge, Kadapa at Proddatur. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Kanala Mahesh, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. 5. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ __ JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY 14th November, 2025. DNB