Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41455 (JHR)

DR SATISH KUMAR v. DR BHOOT NATH MAHTO PRINCIPAL CHAS COLLEGE

Cont.(Cvl)/192/2024 · 2025-11-06

Rajesh Shankar

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:33207 1 Cont. Case (Civil) No.192 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 192 of 2024 ------ Dr. Satish Kumar, Age about 64 years S/o Late C.M. Singh, resident of Qr. No. 15/2, University Colony, Bariyatu-9, P.O. Bariyatu, P.S. Bariyatu, District- Ranchi. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. Dr. Bhoot Nath Mahto S/o not known, Principal, Chas College, Chas, P.O. & P.S. Chas, District- Bokaro. 2. Dr. Rekha Prasad W/o not known, Principal Ramgarh College, Ramgarh, P.O. & P.S. Ramgarh, District-Ramgarh. 3. Dr. Kaushal Kumar S/o not known, Registrar Binod Bihari Mahto Kolyanchal University, P.O. & P.S. Dhanbad, District- Dhanbad. 4. Dr. Mukhtar Alam S/o not known, Registrar Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribagh, Sindur, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District- Hazaribagh. 5. State of Jharkhand. .... .... …. Opp. Parties ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Tanya Rai, Advocate For the O.P. No.1 : Mr. Baibhaw Gahlaut, Advocate For the O.P. No.3 : Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta, Advocate Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate For the O.P. No.4 : Mrs. I. Sen Choudhary, Advocate ------ Order No.11 Date: 06-11-2025 1. The present contempt petition has been filed for initiation of contempt proceeding as against the opposite parties alleging willful violation of order dated 29.08.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 5188 of 2022. 2. A show cause affidavit dated 02.09.2025 has been filed on behalf of the opposite party no.1, paragraph nos.5 to 8 of which read as under: ”5. That upon receipt of the fresh representation from the Petitioner, the Opposite Party No.1 immediately initiated the process of verification of relevant records pertaining to the Petitioner's service period from 19.09.1985 to 31.10.2012 at Chas College, Chas, Bokaro, and furnished the complete details of Provident Fund deduction statement to the Petitioner for the period from 1985 to 2012 vide letter dated 11.10.2023. A copy of letter dated 11.10.2023 has been annexed as Annexure A to the said show cause affidavit. 2025:JHHC:33207 2 Cont. Case (Civil) No.192 of 2024 6. That the said Provident Fund deduction statement clearly shows all deductions made from the Petitioner's salary during his tenure at Chas College, Chas, Bokaro for the aforesaid period. 7. That the Opposite Party No.1 has also taken all other required steps as mandated by this Hon'ble Court's Order. The Opposite Party No.1 has prepared the complete statement of Provident Fund Account showing all transactions and deposits made during the Petitioner's tenure. 8. That with respect to the prayer of the Petitioner for issuance of N.O.C., the Opposite Party No. 1 had already furnished the N.O.C. to the Petitioner on 25.01.2022. A copy of NOC has been annexed as Annexure B to the said show cause affidavit.” 3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid statements made in the show cause affidavit filed on behalf of the opposite party no.1, there is no need to further proceed in the present contempt matter. 4. The contempt proceeding as against the opposite parties including the opposite party no.1 is hereby dropped. 5. The present Contempt Case is accordingly disposed of. 6. The petitioner is, however, at liberty to take appropriate recourse as permissible under law for redressal of his subsisting grievance. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) November 06, 2025 RKM/