Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41448 (AP)

PERUGU VASU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/29835/2025 · 2025-11-02

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

t IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) ‘■^-1 '>S; 2i WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUAR|||'/ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX : PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI A r .} r: ’A fit vN lA No. 1 OF 2025 IN WP NO: 29735 OF 2025 Between: Akkineni Satya Vara Prasad, S/o. Akkineni Bhaskara Rao, Aged about 60 years, Occ; Business, R/o. 17/303, Sidimbi Agraharam, Groud Floor F-1 Zilla Court Centre, Machilipatnam, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh. I Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Marketing Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Krishna District. 2. The Joint Collector, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 3. The Assistant Director of Marketing, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 4. The Estate Officer, Rythu Bazaar, Machilipatnam, Krishna District., Andhra Pradesh. 5. NAFED Vijayawada, Rep by the Branch Manager, 48-19-4B, Nagarjung Nagar, Sri Ramachandra Nagar, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh 520 008. (R5 is impleaded as per the Court's Order dt.10.12.2025 in I.A.No.02 of 2025). Respondents 7 Petition under Section 151 CPC., is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to insist or compel the petitioner to vacate Stall No. 106, Rythu Bazaar, Machilipatnam, and to permit him to continue his lawful business therein, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition, in the interest of justice; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the earlier order of the High Court dated. 03.11.2025, 17.1T2p25, 26.11.2025, 10.12.2025, 29.12.2025, 07.01.2026, 28.01.2026 & 11.02.2026 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. K V ADITYA CHOWDARY, Advocate for the Petitioner and of GP FOR AGRICULTURE & MARKETING, for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4; The Court made the following ORDER: Ms.G.Arthi, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner requested time for filing reply. Post on 09.03.2026. Interim order granted earlier is extended till then. raghavulu EGISTRAR SD/-K-^ assistant //TRUE COPY// ION OFFICER SEC To, 1. One CC to Sri K V ADITYA CHOWDARY, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR AGRICULTURE & MARKETING, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. One spare copy mbt I HIGH COURT X BSB, J DATED: 18.02.2026 POST ON 09.03.2026. li' ORDER lA No. 1 OF 2025 IN WP NO: 29735 OF 2025 INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED.