Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41444 (PNJ)

SUNIL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/9433/2025 · 2025-04-03

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 137 CWP-9433-2025 Date of decision: 03.04.2025 SUNIL ….PETITIONER Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Sidharth Maini, Advocate for Mr. I.P.S. Kohli, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that issue involved in the present case is no more res integra. The instant petition may be disposed of in terms of order dated 19.02.2025 passed in CWP-2311 of 2025 titled as ‘Vinod Kumar and others Vs. State of Haryana and others’. 2. In the wake of statement of both sides, the present petition stands disposed of in terms of dated 19.02.2025 passed in the case of Vinod Kumar (Supra). 03.04.2025 [JAGMOHAN BANSAL] manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2025.04.04 09:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document