[2025:RJ-JP:42857] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6626/2025 Shabbir Hussan Son Of Mazid Khan, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Kasali, Police Station Dhod, District Sikar At Present Suspended From The Post Of Head Constable No. 169 And Posted At Headquarter, Police Line, Sikar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Home Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj). 2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Lal Kothi, Jaipur. 3. Inspector General Of Police, Jaipur Range, Jaipur. 4. Superintedent Of Police, District Sikar (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shribhan Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 17/10/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that Your Lordships may graciously be pleased to allow this writ petition and by way of welt, order or direction, the impugned order dated 30.06.2023 passed by the respondents may kindly be quashed and set aside with all consequential benefits I.by way of writ, order of direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to revoke the suspension order dated 30.06.2023 passed by the respondents against the petitioner. ii.by way of writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to [2025:RJ-JP:42857] (2 of 3) [CW-6626/2025] reinstate the petitioner to the post of Head Constable. iii.Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. iv.Cost of the writ petition may also be awarded to the petitioner. 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the legal position is considered and decided by Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. UOI (2015) 7 SCC 291 and a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court in S.B. CWP no. 12565/2022 titled as “Ratiram Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (order dated 27.08.2022) has followed the same. He further submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in referred judgments but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his [2025:RJ-JP:42857] (3 of 3) [CW-6626/2025] representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /176