Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41440 (RAJ)

RAKESH SONI SON OF SHRI PRAKASH CHAND SONI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/1670/2025 · 2025-04-08

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:15622] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1979/2025 Mohammad Abbas Son Of Shri Mohammad Gulzar, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Luharo Ka Mohalla, Ramgarh Road, Fatehpura, P.s. Fatehpur, Kotwali District Sikar At Present At Rented Premises 93 Udyog Nagar, Pahadiyan House Ke Piche, P.s.jhotwara, District Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Datar Singh Shekhawat Son Of Shri Bheru Singh Shekhawat, Resident Of At 84 Ganesh Colony Gali No. 9, Jain Mandir Ke Pass, Jhotwara, District Jaipur (West), (Raj). ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1670/2025 Rakesh Soni Son Of Shri Prakash Chand Soni, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Main Stand Ke Pass, Ganv Molasar, P.s. Molasar, District Nagaur At Present At Rented Premises 71 Pratap Nagar, Shastri Nagar, P.s. Bhatta Basti, District Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Datar Singh Shekhawat Son Of Shri Bheru Singh Shekhawat, Resident Of At 84 Ganesh Colony Gali No. 9, Jain Mandir Ke Pass, Jhotwara District Jaipur (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Kumar Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 08/04/2025 After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners has summarized the arguments to the apprehension [2025:RJ-JP:15622] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1979/2025] that fair investigation is not being carried out in pursuance to the FIR No.103/2025 registered at Police Station Jothwara, District Jaipur (west) for offences under sections 305(a) of BNS. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that for redressal of the petitioners’ grievance, they have to file a representation before the police authorities, particularly before the concerned Superintendent of Police. Considering the limited issue, this Court directs the concerned Superintendent of Police to decide the representation, so filed by the petitioners, within an upper limit of 15 days from the date of receipt of the same, strictly in accordance with law, and judicial precedents. In light of the same, the present petitions are disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. A copy of this order be placed in connected fie. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /32-33