HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 12792 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent-authority has failed to release the outstanding payment of Rs. 2,61,136.19/- along with interest at the rate of 24% per annum from 24th March, 2020 till the date of actual realization. In respect to his grievances, petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent-authority, but respondent- authority is not paying any heed to the request of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no. 3 Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Aligarh to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation along with certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent 3 within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no. 3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of two months thereafter from the date he receives the representation of the petitioner. September 17, 2025 Sumaira Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shishir Kumar Singh, Vikrant Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Primus Enterprises .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad