[2025:RJ-JP:42691] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15913/2025 Vikas Meena S/o Shri Kishan Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o V/p- Garh- Himmat Singh Teh. Mandawar, District Dausa, State Rajasthan-321609. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Skill Development Government Of Rajasthan Jodhpur, W- 6 Residency Road Jodhpur-342001 2. Director, Technical Education Rajasthan Jodhpur, W-6 Residency Road Jodhpur-342001 3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Secretary, Rajay Kirhsi Prabandh Sansthan Parisar, Durgapura, Jaipur-302018 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 17/10/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “1. To issue appropriate order or direction to respondents to give appointment to the petitioner on the post of Junior Instructor (Employability Skills), considering the certificate of RS-CIT as valid for course of BASIC COMPUTER knowledge, as prescribed in the advt. Of the aforesaid recruitment. 2. To direct the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner in his relevant [2025:RJ-JP:42691] (2 of 3) [CW-15913/2025] trade, of the aforesaid recruitment, considering his qualifications as valid qualification. 3. To direct the respondents to deem the RS- CIT certificate of the petitioner as a valid document to fulfil the recruitment of the BASIC COMPUTER qualification 4. To kindly quash and set aside the office order dated 03.10.2025 (Annexure-10) through which the petitioner’s canddiature has been rejected, by the respondents, inspite of having the valid computer course certificate, required by advt., and the same correctness of the RS-CIT course is also mentioned in the notification dated 17.11.2008 (Annexure-8).” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is having requisite computer qualification but his candidature was not considered without any cogent reason. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation after enquiry about grievances of petitioner with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:42691] (3 of 3) [CW-15913/2025] 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /20