1 APHC010775792015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 36282 OF 2015 Between: 1. Sundupalle Sahadevaiah, S/o.S.. Chinna Nagaiah, Aged about 44 years, Occ: CC (L2) (SERP ID No. 06654), R/o. Thumbakuppam V.O. cluster, Bangarupalyam Mandal, Chittor District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Society for Elimination of Rural Poverty, III and IV Floors, Hermitage Office Complex, H.No. 5-10-192, Hill Fort Road, Hyderabad - 500 004. 3. Project Director DRDA Chittoor Chittoor District. 4. Project Director DRDA Kadapa Kadapa District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring inaction of the 2nd Respondent in considering the Representation dated 25.04.2015 submitted by the petitioner, Letters Roc. No. DRDA/A/545812007 dated 2 05.01.2010, 17.06.2010 and 29-11-2013 sent by the 3rd Respondent and also Letter Ref. No. SA4/HRMS/11/IKP2008, dated 20.04.2011 sent by the 4th Respondent, for recognizing the petitioner on par with his batch mates in the HR policy I seniority list of DRDA Employees of Chittoor and Kadapa District as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents to recognize the petitioner's cadre as L2 with effect from 01.01.2008 on par with his other batch-mates and to forthwith promote the Petitioner to the post of APM (Assistant Project Manager) and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 46682 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to consider the Representation dated 25.04.2015 submitted by the Petitioner to recognize the Petitioner's cadre as L2 with effect from 01.01.2008 on par with his other batch-mates and to promote the Petitioner to the post Counsel for the Petitioner: MANOJ KUMAR AKULA Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV (AP) Counsel for the Respondents:HARI BABU MAGULURI SC For SERP The Court made the following order: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.36282 OF 2015 ORDER: The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following main prayer: “to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring inaction of the 2nd Respondent in considering the Representation dated 25.04.2015 submitted by the petitioner, Letters Roc. No. DRDA/A/545812007 dated 05.01.2010, 17.06.2010 and 29-11- 2013 sent by the 3rd Respondent and also Letter Ref. No. SA4/HRMS/11/IKP2008, dated 20.04.2011 sent by the 4th Respondent, for recognizing the petitioner on par with his batch mates in the HR policy I seniority list of DRDA Employees of Chittoor and Kadapa District as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents to recognize the petitioner's cadre as L2 with effect from 01.01.2008 on par with his other batch-mates and to forthwith promote the Petitioner to the post of APM (Assistant Project Manager) and to pass….” 2. On 24.12.2025, this Court passed the following order: “There is no representation for the petitioner. The Registry is directed to print the name of Sri M.Hari Babu, for the 2nd respondent. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Raviteja Padiri submits that he has given up vakalat. 4 Accordingly, the Registry is directed to delete the names of Sri Raviteja Padiri and Sri M.S.R.Chandra Murthy, learned counsel, as their names were wrongly printed in the cause list. Post the matter next week under the caption „for dismissal‟. 3. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 4. The learned Standing Counsel for respondents 2 to 4 Mr.M.Hari Babu, fairly submits that till today, the 2nd respondent has not passed any order on the representation of the petitioner dated 25.04.2015. 5. Considering the above said fact, the instant writ petition is disposed of in the following manner: The 2nd respondent is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 25.04.2015 by communicating the same to the petitioner, within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law. 6. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date:31.12.2025 Rns 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.36282 of 2015 Date:31.12.2025 Rns