ARVIND CHAVRIYA ALIAS LADDU SON OF SHRI UMMED CHAVRIYA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/12268/2025 · 2025-09-26
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41409 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41409 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:39906] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12268/2025 Arvind Chavriya Alias Laddu Son Of Shri Ummed Chavriya, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of Ambedkar Colony, Near Church, Beawar, Police Station Beawar City, Ajmer (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub-Jail, Beawar) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Kumar Meena, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt.G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 26/09/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.775/2022 registered at Police Station Beawar City, District Ajmer for the offences punishable under Sections 307 & 34 of IPC and Sections 3/25 of Arms Act. 2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the present matter is of bail jump. He contended that due to some bonafide reasons, the petitioner could not appear before the learned trial Court on the date fixed and as such, his bail bonds were forfeited and he was called through arrest warrant. He submits that the petitioner undertakes to appear before the learned trial Court on each and every date as fixed by the trial Court. He thus, prays that the instant bail application may be allowed. [2025:RJ-JP:39906] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12268/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Considering the overall facts & circumstances of the case and on the undertaking of the petitioner that henceforth the petitioner shall appear on each and every date as fixed by the trial Court, I deem it proper to allow the bail application, subject to deposition of fine imposed by the learned trial Court under Section 446 of Cr.P.C (Section 491 of BNSS). 6.
This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Arvind Chavriya Alias Laddu Son Of Shri Ummed Chavriya shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made herein above is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN/S-322