2025:JHHC:34542 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No.6457 of 2025 ----- Mikee Kumari, D/o Raju Ram, R/o Sahjanand Nagar Road No.2, P.O. Rims Medical, P.S. Bariatu & District- Ranchi .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Jharkhand 2.The Chief Engineer, Rural Work Department, Quality Control-cum-Advance Planning Division, Chakradharpur, 102, 2nd Floor, Engineering Building, Kutchery Chowk, GPO Ranchi, P.S. Kotwali & District- Ranchi 3.The Superintending Engineer, Rural Work Department, Work Circle Chaibasa, P.O. Chaibasa, P.S. Chaibasa and District West Singhbhum 4.The Executive Engineer, Rural Work Department, Quality Control-cum-Advance Planning Division, Chakradharpur, Abhiyantran Bhawan, Kutchery Road, GPO Ranch, P.S. Kotwali & District- Ranchi 5.Rashmi Lakra, Head Clerk, Rural Work Department, Quality Control-cum- Advance Planning Division, Chakradharpur, Abhiyantran Bhawan, Kutchery Road, GPO Ranch, P.S. Kotwali & District- Ranchi 6.Raider Security Services Pvt. Malti Complex, Opp Sainath University, Booty More, P.O. Booty, P.S. Sadar & District- Ranchi … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chanchal Jain, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhinay Kumar, AC to G.A.-I …...... 02 / 19.11.2025: Heard, learned counsel for the parties. 2. Petitioner is an employee of Raider Security Services Pvt. Limited. The petitioner has been removed from service by the said employer, who is a private entity and not a State in term of Article 12 of the Constitution amenable to writ jurisdiction. 3. Though the place of posting of the petitioner is the office of the Executive Engineer and some recommendation was made to remove the petitioner, but the fact remains that the petitioner has been removed by his employer, who is not amenable to the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 3. Thus, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition, accordingly, the same is hereby dismissed. Petitioner is at liberty to avail the alternative remedy available to him. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 19th November, 2025 R.S./