Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41406 (PNJ)

TARSEM SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/19311/2019 · 2025-07-17

Sanjay Vashisth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-19311-2019 - 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 299 CRM-M-19311-2019 Date of decision: 17.07.2025 TARSEM SINGH ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present : Mr. Ishwar Lal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manjinder Singh Bhullar, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Bhavyadeep Walia, Advocate for respondent No.3. SANJAY VASHISTH. J.(Oral) 1. The instant petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C has been filed for quashing of FIR No.0071 dated 03.08.2018, under Section 306 of IPC, registered at Police Station Bakshiwala, District Patiala, Punjab. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in some other litigation between the parties, the compromise has been arrived at before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre at Patiala. 3. In view of the said settlement dated 08.07.2025, parties have agreed to withdraw all the pending cases, therefore, counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition with permission to file a fresh quashing petition, based upon the said compromise. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as sought and recorded here- above. 5. However, in case any adverse situation arises with the petitioner, it AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2025.07.19 09:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CRM-M-19311-2019 - 2- would be open for him to seek recall of the present order for the purpose of revival of the instant petition. (SANJAY VASHISTH) 17.07.2025 JUDGE amandeep Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2025.07.19 09:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment