APHC010159532019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] SATURDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 580/2019 Between: G.K S PRAKASH REDDY, BUSINESS, R/O. FLAT NO. 4A, SAPTAGIRI SMILE APARTMENTS, VIDYANAGAR, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1.STATE OF AP, REP., BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI 2.MANNAVA KOTESWARA RAO, R/O.NIMMAGADDAVARIPALEM VILLAGE, PRATHIPADU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.AQBAL AHMED KHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2 Crl.R.C.No.580 of 2019 The Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C.,’) challenging the dismissal of the Criminal Appeal No.210 of 2016 by the learned XII Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Family Judge, Guntur, on 21.02.2019, confirming the order of acquittal passed by the learned VI Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Guntur in C.C.No.6 of 2012 on 26.11.2015 for the offences under Sections. 420, 423 and 468 IPC. 2. No representation for the Petitioner and the Respondent No.2/accused. Case is of the year 2019, one of the oldest cases. Hence, Sri B.Sai Sampath, learned Counsel is appointed as learned Legal Aid Counsel for the respondent No.2/accused. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee is directed to issue necessary orders in this regard. 3. Heard the learned Legal Aid Counsel for the petitioner/defacto complainant and the respondent No.2/accused and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 4. I have carefully gone through the judgment of the learned appellate Court, which has appreciated the evidence afresh in detail, and I find that it has rightly arrived at the same conclusion as that of the learned trial Court, holding that respondent No.2/accused is not guilty of the offences punishable under Sections 420, 423 and 468 IPC. 5. On a careful perusal of the impugned judgment, no irregularities or infirmities are found. Re-appreciation of evidence cannot be undertaken while disposing of a revision case. There are no merits in the revision case and the same is liable to be dismissed. 3 Crl.R.C.No.580 of 2019 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 20.12.2025 SAB / JLSR 4 Crl.R.C.No.580 of 2019 179 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE.No.580 of 2019 Date:20.12.2025 SAB / JLSR