Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41400 (CHH)

KHEDU RAM JAIN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/5373/2024 · 2025-01-21

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 3 2025:CGHC:3670 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5373 of 2024 1 - Khedu Ram Jain S/o Shri Ram Jain, Aged About 64 Years R/o House No. 14, Village-Dhekuna, District-Kanker (C.G.) 2 - Munika Jain W/o Rajeshwar Jain, Aged About 37 Years R/o House No. 14, Village-Dhekuna, District-Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, District North Bastar, Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Superintendent Of Police, Bastar Division, District North Bastar, Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 3 - President, Dadsena Kalar Samaj Bastar Division, District-North Bastar, Kanker, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Aditya Bhardwaj, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. S. S. Choubey, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate 2 / 3 (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 21/01/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners are seeking a direction towards the respondent authorities to decide their pending representations dated 11/07/2024 (Annexure P/1) filed before the respondents No.1 & 2 i.e. Collector, District North Bastar, Kanker and Superintendent of Police, Bastar Division, District North Bastar, Kanker respectively about the boycott of the petitioners and their family members by the respondent No.3. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have made representations on 11/07/2024 before the concerned District Collector as well as the Superintendent of Police, in spite of the information and the representations of the petitioners, the grievance raised by them is not considered and resolved till date. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that as the representations of the petitioners are pending before the concerned Collector and the Superintendent of Police, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law within the stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents. 5. Looking to the grievance of the petitioners that the petitioners and their family members are alleged to be boycotted by respondent No.3, the respondent No.1/ District Collector, District North Bastar, 3 / 3 Kanker is directed to look into the matter and take necessary steps to resolve the grievance raised by the petitioners within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar