2025:JHHC:36673 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.6945 of 2025 ---- Madan Kachhap, aged about 48 years, Son of Late Jagarnath Kachhap, resident of Village – Bermad, P.O Hatia, P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi …. …. Petitioners -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Department of Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, P.O G.P.O, P.S. Lalpur, District Ranchi 4. The Circle Officer, Namkum, P.O. & P.S.-Namkum, District-Ranchi 5. Bhathu Oraon 6. Sukhram Oraon 7. Jatru Oraon, Sr. Nos.5 to 7 are sons of Late Lakhna Oraon, residents of Village- Bermad, P.O.-Hatia, P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi 8. Lakhan Kachhap, son of Late Jaga Mahto, resident of Village - Bermad, P.O. Hatia, P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi 9. Jaga Kachhap 10. Hembo Kachhap, Sr. Nos.9 & 10 are sons of Jagarnath Kachhap and residents of Village Bermad, P.O.-Hatia, P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi 11. Sainika Kachhap 12. Manglu Oraon 13. Sukhram Kachhap 14. Ghutru Oraon, Sr. Nos.11 to 14 are sons of Bawana Kachhap and residents of Village-Bermad, P.O.-Hatia, P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. …. …. Respondents ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ashutosh Anand, AAG-III ---- 02/Dated: 08th December, 2025 1. Heard the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- “(a) for issuance of writ of or a writ in the nature of Mandamus the commanding upon the respondents, particularly, Respondent No.4 i.e., Circle Officer, Namkum, District Ranchi to delete the name of Bhathu Oraon, Sukhram Oraon, Jatru Oraon sons of Late Lakhna Oraon, from Register-II, Part-1, Page No.54 in which, Page No.2 W.P.(C) No.6945 of 2025 entry has been made of the land of Village-Bermad, Thana Ranchi, Thana No.251, Khata No.18, Plot No.32 and 34, measuring an area of 0.39 and 0.65 acres respectively and necessary correction be done in favour of Jaga Mahto in revenue record, who is ancestor revenue of the petitioner.” 3. It appears that this is merely a private dispute between the parties, which can only be resolved by the competent Civil Court, not in writ jurisdiction of this Court. 4. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to entertain the present writ petition. Accordingly, the same is hereby dismissed. 5. However, the parties are at liberty to work out their further remedies in accordance with law. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 08nd December, 2025 Raja/-Uploaded on 10.12.2025