Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52388 CRP No. 486 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.486 OF 2024 (IO) BETWEEN:
SRI NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA, GOPALAPURA VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU NORTH – 562157 …PETITIONER (BY SRI ABHINAV RAMANAND A, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SMT. PARVATHAMMA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, D/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA, GOPALAPURA VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU NORTH – 562 157
2.
SRI MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS,.
S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA,
3.
SRI SUBRAMANI AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O MUNIYAPPA,
4.
SMT. GAJALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, D/O MUNIYAPPA,
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52388 CRP No. 486 of 2024
5.
SMT. NARASAMMA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, D/O MUNIYAPPA,
6.
SRI KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, S/O MUNIYAPPA,
7.
SMT. NARAYANAMMA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, D/O LATE NARASAMMA,
8.
SMT. NARAYANAMMA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS D/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA,
9.
SMT. AMBIKA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, D/O NARAYANASWAMY
10. SRI MANJUNATHA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS S/O NARAYANASWAMY
11. SRI HARISHA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, S/O NARAYANASWAMY
12. SRI SHASHIKUMAR AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS S/O NARAYANASWAMY,
13. SMT. SAVITHRAMMA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA,
RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 13 ALL ARE R/AT GOPALAPURA VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU NORTH-562157.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52388 CRP No. 486 of 2024
14. SRI L MAHENDRA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, S/O LAKSHMANA, R/AT JAYANNA COMPLEX, HUNASAMARANAHALLI, JALA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT – 562157
15. SRI VINAY G AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS S/O GANGARAJU, R/AT SONNAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU NORTH - 562 157 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI RAJESH GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
VIDE ORDER DATED 29.10.2024, NOTICE TO R2 TO R15 IS DISPENSED WITH)
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, AGAINST THE
ORDER DATED 01.04.2024 PASSED ON IA NO.II IN O.S No.1080/2023 ON THE FILE OF III ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI, C/C II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI, DISMISSING THE IA NO.II FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(a) AND (d) R/W SECTION 151 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52388 CRP No. 486 of 2024
ORAL ORDER
Sri Rajesh Gowda, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 files a memo which reads as under:
“The undersigned counsel submits that be please to permit the respondent No.1 to pursue/recall the suit in O.S.No.825/2007 on the file of Civil Judge at Devanahalli, filed by family members as the matter ended into a compromise petition, even the respondent No.1 is a not a party to the said suit in O.S.No.825/2007 and the respondent No.1 filed suit in O.S.No.1080/2023 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge at Devanahalli, is not maintainable, in view of entering compromise in earlier suit in O.S.No.825/2007, in the above case, in the interest of justice.”
2. Placing the memo on record, suit in O.S.No.1080/2023 stands dismissed with liberty for the respondent No.1/plaintiff to file necessary application in O.S.No.825/2007 which stood
disposed of on the file of the Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli.
3. If such an application is filed by the plaintiff, learned Trial Judge shall entertain such an application for the sake of finding out the rights of the plaintiff and if found merit, shall reopen the compromise decree and adjudicate the suit on merits.
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52388 CRP No. 486 of 2024
4. With the above observation, Civil Revision Petition stands
disposed of.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 53