Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41392 (JHR)

PINTU DUTTA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./3094/2022 · 2025-12-03

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:36251] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.3094 of 2022 ------ 1. Pintu Dutta, aged about 48 years, son of Late Kriti Bhushan Dutta, resident of village Bhilai Pahadi, P.O. & P.S. M.G.M, town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum (Jharkhand) 2. Sandeep Laha @ Sandip Kumar Laha @ Sandip Laha, aged about 30 years, son of Sri Jeewan Laha, resident of village Bhilai Pahadi, P.O. & P.S. M.G.M, town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum (Jharkhand) 3. Mrinal Kumar Dutta aged about 52 years, son of Late Diwakar Dutta, resident of village Bhilai Pahadi, P.O. & P.S. M.G.M, town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum (Jharkhand) … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : None For the State : Ms. Nehala Sharmin, Spl.P.P. (Through V.C.) For the Informant : Mr. Dilip Kr. Chakraverty, Advocate ------ Order No:-09 Dated:-03-12-2025 Heard the learned Spl. P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the informant. No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in spite of repeated calls. Learned Spl. P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the informant submit that since there is no merit in this Cr.M.P., hence, the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting this Cr.M.P. Accordingly, this Cr.M.P. is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated- 03.12.2025-Animesh/