- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41639 WP No. 25970 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION No. 25970 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. METRO BUSINESS INDIA PVT. LTD., METRO MOTORS BUILDING, OPP: ASTC, H.B.ROAD, MACHKHOWA, GUWAHATI CITY, ASSAM STATE- 781 009, REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, AMITH SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O SRI. HARIKRISHNA SHARMA, RESIDING AT E-602, PRINCE TOWN APARTMENT, SHETTYHALLI, JALAHALLI WEST, BENGALURU-560015. …PETITIONER (BY SRI PRASANNA V. R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S. FOXBASE TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD., HAVING ITS OFFICE AT No.13, RAHAT, COLES ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU-560 005, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, 2. MRS. JAYA GARG, AGE MAJOR, D/O. MR. BHAVANI SHANKAR GOYAL Digitally signed by VALLI MARIMUTHU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41639 WP No. 25970 of 2025 DIRECTOR OF FOXBASE TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD., R/AT A-306, SIROYA ENVIRON, 24, CHOLA NAGAR, ANANDA NAGAR, HEBBAL, BANGALORE-560024. 3. MRS.JAYANTI CHHAWCHHARIA, AGE MAJOR, D/O MR.BHAVANI SHANKAR GOYAL, DIRECTOR OF FOXBASE TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD., R/AT No.10C, GEM HOUSE, 5B RESEL STREET, MIDDLETON ROW, KOLKATTA-700071. 4. MR.MERLIN RORY PICARDO, AGE MAJOR, S/O JOSEPH PICARDO, DIRECTOR OF FOXBASE TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD., R/AT 2-81B, HALSUS, PANDESHWARA, UDUPI, KARNATAKA-576226. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 26.06.2025 IN IA No.3 TO 5 IN COM. OS No.626/2021 ON THE FILE OF LEARNED LXXXIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY (CCH-90) VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41639 WP No. 25970 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL ORDER Sri V.R. Prasanna, learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter for some time, seeks leave of this Court to urge all the contentions raised in the present petition before the concerned Court at the appropriate stage. 2. It is needless to observe that those submissions would merit consideration by the concerned Court at the appropriate stage. 3. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE MV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13