Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010297472023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.15217 of 2023 Between:
1. ADINARAYANA REDDY, /O. PEDDA NARAPAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. H.NO.127, TAMBBAPURAM VILLAGE, BATTALAPALLI MANDAL, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT, NOW SATYA SAI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROAD, TRANSPORT AND NATIONAL HIGHWAYS, NEW DELHI. REP. BY IT'S UNDER SECRETARY.
2. NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR.
3. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH RANDB, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER.
4. THE JOINT COLLECTOR AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY LAND ACQUISITION, PUTTAPARTHI, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.
5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER RANDB, NATIONAL HIGHWAY DIVISION, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.
6. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DHARMAVARAM, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT
7. THE TAHSILDAR, BHATALLAPALLI MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENTS
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court
2
may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in laying the road in the land of the petitioner i.e., Sy.No.43- 4B of Apara Cheruvu Village, Bhatallapalli Mandal, Anantapuramu District now Satya Sai District without paying the compensation as determined in Award No.05/2022-23 dated 02.01.2023 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the provisions of the National Highways Act and consequently direct the respondents not to lay the road in the land of the petitioner till the compensation amount as determined is paid to the petitioner.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. O M R LAW FIRM
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS
2. GP FOR REVENUE
3. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION
4. S S VARMA (SC FOR NHAI)
5.
The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letter in the Registry stating that he has received instructions from the writ petitioner to withdraw the present Writ Petition and hence he sought permission of the Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition and he also endorsed the same on the bundle.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 31.10.2025
siva
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.15217 of 2023
Date: 31.10.2025
siva