IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 206 Shiv Karan Vinay Pratap Singh, IAS, Collector, Estate Office, Sector 17, UT Chandigarh and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings the order dated Commissioner before this Court on 22.3.2017 in COCP No.125 of 2014 titled as “Raj Pal and others vs. Mohamad Shayin” and for punishing respondent No.1 for not ensuring the compliance of the underta the Court and respondents No.2 to 4 have failed to fulfil their duties by way of not complying with the specific undertaking given by respondent No.1. COCP-1207-2023 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1207 of 2023 Date of decision : Shiv Karan Versus Vinay Pratap Singh, IAS, The Deputy Commissioner Collector, Estate Office, Sector 17, UT Chandigarh and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Mohak Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana Mr. Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceedings be initiated against the respondent the order dated 27.9.2016 (Annexure P Commissioner-cum-Collector which was duly submitted on affidavit before this Court on 22.3.2017 in COCP No.125 of 2014 titled as “Raj Pal and others vs. Mohamad Shayin” and for punishing respondent No.1 for not ensuring the compliance of the underta the Court and respondents No.2 to 4 have failed to fulfil their duties by way of not complying with the specific undertaking given by respondent No.1. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1207 of 2023 (O & M) Date of decision :-07.08.2025 …..Petitioner The Deputy Commissioner-cum- Collector, Estate Office, Sector 17, UT Chandigarh and others …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mohak Arora, Advocate Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana. Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that contempt against the respondent(s) for not complying 27.9.2016 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Deputy Collector which was duly submitted on affidavit before this Court on 22.3.2017 in COCP No.125 of 2014 titled as “Raj Pal and others vs. Mohamad Shayin” and for punishing respondent No.1 for not ensuring the compliance of the undertaking given before the Court and respondents No.2 to 4 have failed to fulfil their duties by way of not complying with the specific undertaking given by VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.08 18.27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Court, learned counsel for respon reply dated 21.8.2023 by way of affidavit of Anindita Mitra, IAS, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh in the Registry, which is annexed with the file. The said Reply is ordered to be taken on record. Copy t petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper- necessary compliance has been made; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. said fact and admits that as per reply dated 21.8.2023 the compliance has been made. passed in the present petition, the same is August 07 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-1207-2023 (O & M) In pursuance of order dated 25.4.2023 passed by this Court, learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4 has already filed the reply dated 21.8.2023 by way of affidavit of Anindita Mitra, IAS, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh in the Registry, which is annexed with the file. The said Reply is ordered to be taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in -book. Learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4 submits that necessary compliance has been made; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the said fact and admits that as per reply dated 21.8.2023 the compliance has been made. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. 7, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 In pursuance of order dated 25.4.2023 passed by this dents No.2 to 4 has already filed the reply dated 21.8.2023 by way of affidavit of Anindita Mitra, IAS, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh in the Registry, which is annexed with the file. The said Reply is ordered to be taken hereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in Learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4 submits that necessary compliance has been made; thus, no cause survives in the Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the said fact and admits that as per reply dated 21.8.2023 the compliance In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is disposed of accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.08 18.27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document