RAJESH KUMAR SON OF LATE SH. MOHANLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/12423/2025 · 2025-10-17
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41385 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41385 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:42569] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12423/2025 Rajesh Kumar Son Of Late Sh. Mohanlal, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Village Jharewa Post Birodi Chhoti Via Bidasar District Sikar Rajasthan, Presently Posted As Senior Teacher (Science) At Government Senior Secondary School, Udaidass Ki Dhani, Radhakishanpura, Sikar, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Government Secretariat Jaipur.
2. Director, Secondary, Education, Bikaner.
3. Joint Director, School Education, Churu Division, Churu, Rajasthan.
4. District Education Officer, Secondary Education (Hq), Sikar, Rajasthan.
5. Chief Block Education Officer, Piprali, Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Saini For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 17/10/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition in the interest of justice and by an appropriate writ, order or directions: - (I) That the impugned action of respondent authority whereby his initial date of appointment has considered as 01.07.1998
[2025:RJ-JP:42569] (2 of 3) [CW-12423/2025] be quashed and set-aside and theymay be
directed to consider it since 03.01.1998 and accordingly, issue all benefits like regularization/ fixation and revised the date of granting first and second ACP also (ii) By appropriate writ, order or direction authority be directed to pay the salary of summer
vacation
period
to
the petitioner
along
with
interest. (iii) Any order or proceeding initiated/passed against the humble petitioner after filing the writ petition be also taken on record and may kindly be quashed and set-aside. (iv) Cost of this writ petition may kindly be awarded in favour of the humble petitioner.
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the controversy raised herein is already decided by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in case of Yogesh Kumar Pareek Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B. CWP no. 3534/2009, decided on 20th January, 2014 and followed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11147/2020 Rajendra Kumar & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. (order dated 12.11.2020). He also submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the
[2025:RJ-JP:42569] (3 of 3) [CW-12423/2025] respondents-Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ration as referred hereinaboves but with a reasoned and speaking
order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /111