Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK I.A. No.10661 of 2025 Arising out of WP(C) No.16861 of 2025 Kartick Chandra Patra ..... Petitioner Represented By Adv. - Asit Kumar Jena -versus- State Of Odisha and others ..... Opposite Parties Represented By Adv. – Mr.A.P.Bose,Advocate Ms.J.Sahoo, ASC CORAM: MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA ORDER 31.07.2025 Order No. 03. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard from the learned counsel for the Applicant (who was the Opposite Party No.6 in the disposed of writ petition vide W.P.(C) No.16861 of 2025) and the learned counsel for the Opposite Party (who was the Petitioner in the disposed of writ petition vide W.P.(C) No.16861 of 2025) and the learned ASC for the State. 3. After hearing from the learned counsels of both the sides, it is felt proper to dispose of this I.A. finally making it clear that, there is no bar for the O.P. No.6 in the disposed of writ petition vide W.P.(C) No.16861 of 2025 to raise the question of maintainability of O.E.A. Appeal before the Appellate Authority and the Page 2 of 2. Appellate Authority shall dispose of the O.E.A. Appeal as per law. 4. Accordingly, the I.A. is disposed of finally. ( ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA) Judge Binayak