[2025:RJ-JP:39383] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14663/2025 Asif S/o Raheesa, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Village Pipalkheda, Tehsil Pahari, District Deeg- 32102 (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Administrative Reforms Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur Through Its Secretary, Having Its Office At Rajasthan Agriculture Management Institute Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur- 302018. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Illyas Khan Mr. Mohit Sharma for Mr. Tanveer Ahmad For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 24/09/2025 1. It is stated that pursuant to advertisement dated 13.02.2024 issued by Rajasthan Staff Selection Board for the post of LDC Grade-II/Junior Assistant, the petitioner submitted the application form in the category of specially abled person (Locomotor Disability). After participating in the process, he secured 154.8317 marks which is more than the cut off marks 146.3889 declared by the respondents for the category of specially abled persons (locomotor disabilities). 2. Grievance of the petitioner is that although, the petitioner possesses one permanent disability certificate dated [2025:RJ-JP:39383] (2 of 3) [CW-14663/2025] 07.11.2017 issued by the Chief Medical and Health Officer, Bharatpur, Rajasthan reflecting that the petitioner was diagnozed with Congenitil Deformity Right Leg which was assessed at 42% permanent disability. However, after conducting a fresh medical examination, the petitioner's candidature in the category of specially abled person has been rejected by referring such disability to be temporary nature. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready for fresh examination of his physical disability through another Medical Board and would also abide by the report of such fresh Medical Board. 4. In the light of above, where there appears to be some contradiction between the earlier disability certificate dated 07.11.2017, and the communication sent by the respondents on the basis of report of the Medical Board constituted by the respondents for the purpose of recruitment process in question, this Court deems it just and proper to direct the respondent No. 1 to constitute a fresh Medical Board of the experts preferably comprising of doctors from AIIMS, Jodhpur, who shall examine the petitioner with regard to nature and extent of his disability and shall also submit a report within a period of one month from the date of submitting an application by the petitioner along with a certified copy of this order. 5. The petitioner is also directed to deposit Rs.10,000/- in the office of respondent No.3 as expenses for constitution of fresh Medical Board. [2025:RJ-JP:39383] (3 of 3) [CW-14663/2025] 6. The respondents shall act in accordance with report of such fresh Medical Board regarding nature and extent of disability of the petitioner. 7. The writ petition stand disposed of accordingly. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/45