Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41355 (RAJ)

MOHIT S/O CHETRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/592/2025 · 2025-01-31

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4481] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 592/2025 Mohit S/o Chetram, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Sunhaira, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg (Raj.). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 31/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.367/2024 registered at Police Station Kaman, District Deeg for the offences under Sections 394 and 34 IPC. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the material available on record. 4. The allegations levelled against the petitioner in the FIR is that he alongwith other co-accused snatched the mobile phone and Rs.1500 from the complainant. 5. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 01.10.2024. 6. Taking into consideration the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and overall facts and circumstances of the case [2025:RJ-JP:4481] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-592/2025] including the allegations levelled against the petitioner and more particularly the fact that the offences alleged against him are triable by the Court of Magistrate and he is in custody for last about three months, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above in connection with the aforesaid FIR shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/-, together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /407