IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 330 Emandeep Kaur State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. respondents to consider and appoint as a JBT advertisement issued in April, 2000, might not even be surviving due to the efflux of time. 2. statement by way of affidavit of Chairman, Depart Committee(P), of Rule 6 of the Punjab State Education Service Rules, 19 males were to be selected candidates cannot be compared with that of male. In the category of the petitioner, even after adding marks of the interview 70%, her merit was below Roll No.154818 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Emandeep Kaur Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Ms. Rishu Bajaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amarpeet Singh Bains, AAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition for respondents to consider and appoint as a JBT advertisement issued in April, 2000, might not even be surviving due to the efflux of time. Learned State counsel refers to statement by way of affidavit of Chairman, Depart Committee(P), dated 15.11.2002, wherein it has been stated that in terms of Rule 6 of the Punjab State Education Class Service Rules, 1997, dated 11.06.1998, Annexure R males were to be selected in the ratio of 50:50 candidates cannot be compared with that of male. In the category of the petitioner, even after adding marks of the interview her merit was below Roll No.154818, who secured 58.56% marks IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1729-2002 (O & M) Date of decision: 05.04.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Amarpeet Singh Bains, AAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition for directing the respondents to consider and appoint as a JBT Teacher, pursuant to the advertisement issued in April, 2000, might not even be surviving due to Learned State counsel refers to para 9, 10 and 12 of written statement by way of affidavit of Chairman, Department of Selection wherein it has been stated that in terms Class-III (Primary School Cadre) Annexure R-2, the females and in the ratio of 50:50 and the merit of the female candidates cannot be compared with that of male. In the category of the petitioner, even after adding marks of the interview that were more than , who secured 58.56% marks. PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.04.05 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-1729-2002 -2- She is comparing her marks which she obtained, even without adding those awarded for the interview to be 44.69%, with the last selected candidate in the male category, who had secured 44.36%. The above facts have not even been controverted by filing any replication. 3. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, in case lis still subsists. 05.04.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.04.05 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.