VIKAS GARG v. UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
CRM-M/18415/2025 · 2025-04-04
Karamjit Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41352 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41352 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-18415-2025 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-18415-2025 Date of decision: 04.04.2025 Vikas Garg ...Petitioner Versus Union Territory of Chandigarh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Ram Kumar Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. **** KARAMJIT SINGH, J. (ORAL)
1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will be satisfied if a time bound direction is given to the official respondents to consider and decide representation dated 21.02.2025 (Annexure P-4).
2. Notice of motion.
3. Mr. Balram Singh, Addl. PP, UT Chandigarh, accepts notice on behalf of the State and submitted that in case any complaint/representation(s) submitted by the petitioner is pending, the concerned authorities will consider and decide the same as per law.
4. In view of above and without going into the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide representation dated 21.02.2025 (Annexure P-4) in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 04.04.2025 (KARAMJIT SINGH) Yogesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No Yogesh Mehta 2025.04.04 15:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document