Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41351 (AP)

Guthi Rajanna, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/11088/2019 · 2025-11-02

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010247032019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 11088/2019 Between: 1. GUTHI RAJANNA,, S/O.LATE GURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O GUTHIVARIPALLE, RAYALPET POST, PEDDA PANJANI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. GUTHI SUBRAMANYAM,, S/O.LATE GURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O GUTHIVARIPALLE, RAYALPET POST, PEDDA PANJANI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. GUTHI NARASAMMA,, W/O.LATE ANANDA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O GUTHIVARIPALLE, RAYALPET POST, PEDDA PANJANI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAMANER, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALAMANER, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PEDDAPANJANI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, 7. GUTHI CHINNAPPA, S/O. LATE CHENGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O GUTHIVARIPALLE, ROYALPET POST, PEDDA PANJANI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. , 8. GUTHI RAMAPPA, S/O.LATE CHENGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION R/O GUTHIVARIPALLE, ROYALPET POST, PEDDA PANJANI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 9. GUTHI SREENIVASULU, S/O.LATE CHENGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O GUTHIVARIPALLE, ROYALPET POST, PEDDA PANJANI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 10. GUTHI SHANTHAMMA, W/O.LATE VENKATACHALAPATHI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O GUTHIVARIPALLE, ROYALPET POST, PEDDA PANJANI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 11. GUTHI SUDHAKAR, S/O.LATE KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O GUTHIVARIPALLE, ROYALPET POST, PEDDA PANJANI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K ASAD AHAMED Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No. 11088 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents 3 to 6 more particularly the 4th and 5th respondents calling the petitioners to police station for no reason, asking them to wait for hours together, interfering in civil disputes, threatening the petitioners to vacate the petitioners lands and directing to hand it over to unofficial respondents No.7 to 11 and interfering with the petitioners personal liberty without following due process of Law as illegal, high handed, violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 3 to 6 particularly the 4th and 5th respondent not to threat petitioners by calling police station and interfere in civil disputes between petitioners and unofficial respondents No.7 to 11 without following due process of Law.” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri K.Asad Ahamed, learned counsel for the writ petitioner present. 4 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that police enquiry would reveal that the matter is of civil in nature, and police will not interfere in the matter. 4. The submissions of learned Additional Government Pleader for Home are placed in record. 5. In that view of the matter, no further orders are required in this matter, and the writ petition can be closed at the stage of admission, without going into the merits of this case. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed at the stage of admission, without going into the merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 03.11.2025 PSK 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 36 WRIT PETITION No:11088 OF 2019 Date: 03.11.2025 W PSK