- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33156 RSA No. 1056 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1056 OF 2025 (POS) BETWEEN: G. KARUNAKARA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O. G. PAKEERAPPA SHETTY, PROP GANESH AGENCY, D. NO.393/20 AND 22, GROUND FLOOR, COMPLEX, VANDERHOBLI, KUNDAPURA - 576 201. …APPELLANT (BY SRI.K PRASANNA SHETTY., ADVOCATE) AND: M/S. BHANDARKARS' ARTS AND SCIENCE COLLEGE TRUST (R), KUNDAPURA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL AND SECRETARY, DR. N. P. NARAYANA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, SON OF P. MAHALINGA SHETTY, VADERHOBLI VILLAGE, COLLEGE ROAD, KUNDAPURA TOWN AND POST - 576 201. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. AJITH A SHETTY., ADVOCATE FOR C/R) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.04.2025 PASSED IN RA NO.65/2024 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KUNDAPURA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.08.2024 PASSED IN OS Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33156 RSA No. 1056 of 2025 NO.60/2018 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent and authorised representative of the respondent is present. 2. Compromise petition filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC, 1908. 3. Contents of the compromise petition are read over to the parties, and they have agreed that the contents of the compromise petition depict true terms of the settlement. 4. They also submit that there is no force, undue influence or coercion in reaching out for the terms of the compromise petition. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33156 RSA No. 1056 of 2025 5. Accordingly, there is no impediment for this Court to place the compromise petition and dispose of the appeal in terms of the compromise petition. 6. Hence, the following: ORDER i. The appeal stands disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. ii. Office is directed to pass modified decree in terms of the compromise petition, appending the copy of the compromise petition as part of the decree. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KVR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 66