- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33063 WP No. 3521 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 3521 OF 2021 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. C.S. MOHAMMED IBRAHIM AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS S/O LATE C.A. SIDDI MOHAMMED PARTNER OF "BADSHA STORE" SHOP NO.5 GROUND AND CELLAR VISVESWARAYA BHAVAN, K.R.CIRCLE MYSORE-570 001. 2. MOHAMMED SHAHID AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O GULAM MOHAMMED PARTNER OF "SHOE MUSEUM" SHOP NO.1, 1C, VISVESWARAYA BHAVAN K.R.CIRLCE, MYSORE-570 001. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B.S.NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY M.S.BUILDING, Dr.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDI BENGALURU-560 001. Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33063 WP No. 3521 of 2021 2. THE MYSURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE MYSURU CITY, MYSURU-570 001. REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.BOPANNA BELLIAPPA, AGA FOR R1; SRI. HEMANTH P., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. GEETHA DEVI M.P., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICES DATED 19.01.2021 MADE IN REF.NO.R8(2)PR/255/2020-21 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 MYSURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, COPIES AT ANNEXURES-A AND A1 RESPECTIVELY AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER 1. The writ petition is filed, challenging the notices issued by respondent no.2 calling upon the petitioners to vacate their shops. 2. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 upon instructions submits that the shops admittedly belong to - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33063 WP No. 3521 of 2021 respondent No.2 - the Mysuru Mahanagara Palike. However, the notices have been issued erroneously and hence, subsequently, the same have been withdrawn and appropriate proceedings under the Karnataka Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1974 have been initiated to have the petitioners evicted from the property. 3. It is seen that the writ petition pertains to issuance of impugned notices and nothing else. As the same has been withdrawn, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21