Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:44821
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 903 of 2025 1 - Rajindar Kumar S/o Shri Nawal Sai, Aged About 43 Years Constable (Gd) At Police Station Surajpur, District Surajpur (C.G.)
... Applicant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Superintendent Of Police, District Surajpur (C.G.) 4 - Vijay Kumar Kerketta, Presently Working As Constable (Gd) At Police Station Chandni, District Surajpur (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Applicant : Mr. C. J. K. Rao, Advocate For State/Respondents No. 1 to 3. : Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.09.03 18:13:04 +0530
2
Order on Board 03/09/2025
1. Heard.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant wants to contest the case on merits and, therefore, he prays for restoration of WPS No.5939/2021, which was dismissed for non- compliance of peremptory order dated 06.12.2023.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State raised objection.
4. Though, this M.C.C has been filed after about more than one and half year from dismissal of WPS No.5939/2021 vide order dated 09.01.2024, in non-compliance of peremptory order dated 06.12.2023, but having considered judgment rendered by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.12.2016 in M.C.C. No.591/2016 (Smt. Jyoti vs. General Manager, Canara Bank, Staff Selection (Workmen), Circle, Office Mumbai), the instant M.C.C. is allowed.
5. Accordingly, the Registry is directed to restore WPS No.5939/2021, (Rajindar Kumar vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others) in its original number. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge
Ravi Mandavi