Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41345 (AP)

BOLAGANI VENKATA SIVA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/31095/2025 · 2025-11-10

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010595802025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31095/2025 Between: 1. BOLAGANI VENKATA SIVA RAO, S/O NARAYANA RAO AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO.3-23-14, FLAT NO.301, VIMALADEVI HOMES, 4THLANE, RAVINDRA NAGAR, PATTABHIPURAM, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 3. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ARUNDALPET POLICE STATION, ARUNDELPET, GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4 4. GANDRALA SREEKANTH, S/O YESUPADAM, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC GOVERNMENT EMIOYEE, R/O. FLAT NO. 205, 2ND FLOOR, TEJA EMPIRE APARTMENT ASHRAMAM ROAD, TADEPALLI TOWN GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHAKRAVARTHY P V S K Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of the respondent No.3 in investigating the crime in FIR No. 336 / 2025 on the file the Arundalpet Police Station properly, is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Fundamental Rights enshrined under the Constitution of India and consequently 2 direct the 3rd respondent to investigate into the crime in FIR.No. 336 / 2025 on the file of the Arundalpet Police Station within a fixed time frame in accordance with law and pass.” 2. Heard Sri Sri chakravarthy P V S K, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home seeks time to get instructions in the matter. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of by directing respondents/Police to conclude the investigation and file report in this matter as expeditiously as possible, as per law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:11.11.2025 RSD 3 100 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.31095 of 2025 Date:11.11.2025 RSD