Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41344 (AP)

Banka Devadanam, v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/8948/2019 · 2025-11-13

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010204322019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 8948/2019 Between: 1. BANKA DEVADANAM, S/O. PERIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC VEGETABLE VENDOR, R/O. DOOR NO.1-112, RAMAPURAM VILLAGE, PEDAKURAPADU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, AMARAVATHI POLICE STATION, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. MR PRABHAKAR RAO, STATION HOUSE OFFICER, AMARVATHI POLICE STATION, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. CHEKURI MOSHE, , S/O.RATHIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O.MUNUGODU VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the highhanded action on the part of the respondent No.3 in pressurizing me to settle the issue with the respondent No.5 in connection with complaint, dated 05-03-2019 submitted by me as arbitrary, illegal, colorable exercise of power and violate the fundamental rights guaranteed to me under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No. 3 not to pressurize me to compromise the complaint, dated 05-03-2019 submitted by me with the respondent No.5 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 3 not to pressurize me to compromise the complaint, dated 05-03-2019 submitted by me with the respondent No.5 pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V N KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.8948 OF 2019 ORDER: Learned counsel representing Sri P.V.N.Kiran Kumar, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that at this length of time, no orders are required in the writ petition and it may be closed. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. Recording the submissions made by learned counsel for the writ petitioner, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 14.11.2025 PSK 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 18 WRIT PETITION No:8948 OF 2019 Date: 14.11.2025 W PSK