Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41341 (ALL)

SMT. ANURADHA TRIGUNAYAT v. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

WRIC/11931/2013 · 2025-09-15

Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 11931 of 2013 Court No. - 29 (Sl.No.194) HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. The Division Bench vide order dated 03.07.2023 had issued the notice to the petitioner to engage another counsel as the petitioner's counsel has been designated as Senior Counsel. 2. As per the office report dated 12.07.2023 notice has been sent to the petitioner but till date no step has been taken by the petitioner. 3. In view of the fact that the matter pertains to the year 2013 and in the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 5. In case the petitioner feels that the matter survives, liberty is granted to him to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. September 16, 2025 Ashish Pd. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anoop Trivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashwani K. Misra, Vrindavan Mishra (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Smt. Anuradha Trigunayat .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad